Bone remodeling and hydroxyapatite resorption in coated primary hip prostheses.

Clin Orthop Relat Res

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Atrium Medical Center, PO Box 4446, 6401, CX, Heerlen, The Netherlands.

Published: February 2009

Hydroxyapatite coatings for THA promote bone ongrowth, but bone and coating are exposed to stress shielding-driven osteoclastic resorption. We asked: (1) if the resorption of hydroxyapatite coating and bone ongrowth correlated with demographics; (2) if the resorption related to the stem level; and (3) what happens to the implant-bone interface when all hydroxyapatite coating is resorbed? We recovered 13 femoral components from cadaveric specimens 3.3 to 11.2 years after uneventful primary THA. Three cross sections (proximal, medial, distal) of the hydroxyapatite-coated proximal implant sleeve were analyzed by measuring the percentage of residual hydroxyapatite and bone ongrowth on the implant perimeter. Hydroxyapatite resorption was independent of patient age but increased with time in vivo and mostly was gone after 8 years. Bone ongrowth was independent of time in vivo but decreased with aging patients. Only in the most proximal section did less residual hydroxyapatite correlate with less bone ongrowth. Hydroxyapatite resorption, which was more proximal than distal, showed no adverse effects on the implant-bone interface.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2628530PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0559-yDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bone ongrowth
20
hydroxyapatite resorption
12
hydroxyapatite
8
hydroxyapatite coating
8
implant-bone interface
8
residual hydroxyapatite
8
time vivo
8
bone
7
resorption
6
ongrowth
5

Similar Publications

Background: Implant fixation is often the cornerstone of musculoskeletal surgical procedures performed to provide bony fixation and/or fusion. The aim of this study was to evaluate how different design features and manufacturing methods influence implant osseointegration and mechanical properties associated with fixation in a standardized model in cancellous bone of adult sheep.

Methods: We evaluated the performance of three titanium alloy implants: (A) iFuse-TORQ implant; (B) Fenestrated Sacroiliac Device; and (C) Standard Cancellous Bone Screw in the cancellous bone of the distal femur and proximal tibia in 8 sheep.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Cementless fixation in total joint arthroplasty: Factors impacting osseointegration.

J Clin Orthop Trauma

February 2025

Orthopedic Surgery, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.

•The success of cementless fixation in TJA depends on a multitude of factors including biological, mechanical, implant, surgical, and material properties.•Biologic fixation has become the primary mode of fixation for the majority of primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) surgeries done today in the United States (US) due to its low complication rate and superior longevity compared to cemented fixation.•Cementless fixation has yet to gain wider acceptance in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and hip hemiarthroplasty due to several factors including host bone quality, implant design, and surgical technique.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: A novel pelvic fixation screw fusion device (iFuse Bedrock Granite implant) was designed to promote bony fusion through self-harvesting fenestrations throughout the outer screw shank. Bone on-growth and in-growth using this design have been demonstrated in a sheep model, but data from human subjects have not been reported. A 66-year-old medically complex female with 2 prior spine fusions developed spondylodiscitis cephalad to a prior fusion, requiring the removal of instrumentation, which included screw fusion devices.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Active osseointegration in an porcine bone model.

Front Bioeng Biotechnol

March 2024

Biomechanics Group, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

Achieving osseointegration is a fundamental requirement for many orthopaedic, oral, and craniofacial implants. Osseointegration typically takes three to 6 months, during which time implants are at risk of loosening. The aim of this study was to investigate whether osseointegration could be actively enhanced by delivering controllable electromechanical stimuli to the periprosthetic bone.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion has become increasingly prevalent and is described to reduce pain and improve function. In some patients, pain can recur several months after primary surgery. Lack of early implant osseointegration might be a cause of pain and hence an indication for revision surgery.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!