Expert systems for clinical pathology reporting.

Clin Biochem Rev

Department of Biochemistry, St John of God Pathology, Wembley, WA 6913, Australia.

Published: August 2008

* Conventional automated interpretative reporting systems use standard or "canned" comments for patient reports. These are result-specific and do not generally refer to the patient context. * Laboratory information systems (LIS) are limited in their application of patient-specific content of reporting. * Patient-specific interpretation requires extensive cross-referencing to other information contained in the LIS such as previous test results, other related tests, and clinical notes, both current and previous. * Expert systems have the potential to improve reporting quality by enabling patient-specific reporting in clinical laboratories.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2556573PMC

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

expert systems
8
reporting
5
systems clinical
4
clinical pathology
4
pathology reporting
4
reporting conventional
4
conventional automated
4
automated interpretative
4
interpretative reporting
4
reporting systems
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!