Biliary cast syndrome (BCS), the presence of biliary casts and debris causing biliary obstruction, occurs in 4%-18% of orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) recipients. Potential consequences include cholangitis and graft damage or loss. Limited data exist regarding the etiology and outcomes of BCS. The purpose of this study was to evaluate donor and recipient risk factors and determine the impact of BCS. A retrospective review of 355 OLT cases identified 9 BCS patients (2.5%) diagnosed by cholangiography. Twenty-six matched controls were also identified. The warm ischemic time was significantly longer in BCS patients. Other recipient and donor preoperative and intraoperative characteristics, including the donor risk index, revealed no significant differences. Overall patient survival showed a trend toward worse outcomes at 6, 12, and 18 months and end of follow-up in the BCS group. Overall graft survival was also worse in the BCS group at all time periods, with statistical significance demonstrated at 18 months and end of follow-up. The number of therapeutic biliary procedures and hospital readmissions was significantly higher in the BCS group. Twenty-two percent of the BCS patients required repeat OLT versus none of the control patients. In conclusion, BCS is an uncommon complication of OLT. Except for a longer warm ischemic time, recipient and donor factors did not predict the occurrence of BCS. BCS patients showed a significantly worse graft survival, as well as a trend toward worse patient survival. Given the negative impact of BCS on liver transplant outcomes, further studies appear justified.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lt.21492 | DOI Listing |
J Clin Exp Hepatol
December 2024
Department of Medical Gastroenterology, AIIMS, Bhubaneswar, India.
Objective: To assess the effects of inferior vena cava and/or hepatic vein (IVC±HV) venoplasty on liver volumetry and function in individuals with Budd Chiari syndrome (BCS) who present with ascites and at least one patent hepatic vein.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 17 patients with BCS (6 males and 11 females, average age of 42.3 ± 11.
Cureus
December 2024
Department of Breast, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, GBR.
Background The incidence of margin re-excision following breast conserving surgery (BCS) is a quality measure in the National Health Service. The threshold is less than 20% of all BCS procedures. Despite three decades of studies and a wealth of literature identifying multiple factors associated with increased risk for margin involvement, an accepted threshold rate affecting one in five procedures remains high.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCancer
February 2025
General Medicine Service, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Background: Breast cancer screening (BCS) inequities are evident at national and local levels, and many health systems want to address these inequities, but may lack data about contributing factors. The objective of this study was to inform health system interventions through an exploratory analysis of potential multilevel contributors to BCS inequities using health system data.
Methods: The authors conducted a cross-sectional analysis within a large academic health system including 19,774 individuals who identified as Black (n = 1445) or White (n = 18,329) race and were eligible for BCS.
BMC Res Notes
January 2025
Department of Surgery, Department of Clinical Sciences, Division of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Objectives: Positive resection margins after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) most often demands a repeat surgery. To preoperatively identify patients at risk of positive margins, a multivariable model has been developed that predicts positive margins after BCS with a high accuracy. This study aimed to externally validate this prediction model to explore its generalizability and assess if additional preoperatively available variables can further improve its predictive accuracy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Clin Med
January 2025
2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 30-688 Kraków, Poland.
Dialysis patients face multidimensional challenges that affect their quality of life. This study aimed to evaluate the association between dialysis duration and various physical, cognitive, and psychosocial parameters, including fatigue, pain, sexual satisfaction, bowel control, vision, cognitive deficits, mental health, social support, quality of life, and life satisfaction, while incorporating sociodemographic data for greater context. A cross-sectional study was conducted using validated instruments such as the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS), Pain Effect Scale (PES), Sexual Satisfaction Scale (SSS), Bowel Control Scale (BWCS), Impact of Visual Impairment Scale (IVIS), Perceived Deficits Questionnaire (PDQ), Mental Health Inventory (MHI), Modified Social Support Survey (MSSS), WHOQOL-BREF, and Cantril Ladder.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!