There is minimal research regarding men's knowledge of the limitations of prostate cancer screening. This study measured knowledge of prostate cancer screening based on exposure to one of two decision aids that were related to prostate cancer screening (enhanced versus usual care). The sample consisted primarily of low income (54%) African-American men (81%) (n=230). The enhanced decision aid was compared against the usual care decision aid that was developed by the American Cancer Society. The enhanced decision aid was associated with higher post-test knowledge scores, but statistically significant differences were observed only in the men who reported having had a previous DRE (p = 0.013) in the multivariable analyses. All the men were screened, regardless of which decision aid they received. This study highlights the impact of previous screening on education of the limitations of prostate screening, and challenges the assumption that increased knowledge of the limitations of prostate cancer screening will lead to decreased screening.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

decision aid
20
prostate cancer
20
cancer screening
20
limitations prostate
16
screening
8
knowledge limitations
8
usual care
8
enhanced decision
8
decision
6
prostate
6

Similar Publications

Background/purpose: Selecting an appropriate coronal restoration after root canal treatment requires careful consideration, however, there is a lack of established web-based tool that is based on clear guidelines for suitable post-endodontic restorations. Hence, we aimed to design and determine the acceptability of an interactive application to aid the decision making process for post-endodontic restoration among the undergraduate dental students.

Materials And Methods: A web-based post-endodontic restoration decision making interactive application, ( was developed after a detailed review of available literature.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Implications of the fair processes for financing UHC report for development assistance: reflections and an application of the decision-making principles to PEPFAR.

Health Econ Policy Law

January 2025

Health Systems Program, Department of International Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.

The framework presented in the World Bank report Open and Inclusive: Fair processes for Financing Universal Health Coverage effectively connects proposed decision-making principles with practical examples that country governments can use to pursue greater fairness. In this commentary, we consider the suggestion that international development partners might use the report's criteria to examine their own processes. We consider what the report's primary Fair Process principles - equality, impartiality and consistency - imply for development partners.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: The objective of this research is to enhance pneumonia detection in chest X-rays by leveraging a novel hybrid deep learning model that combines Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) with modified Swin Transformer blocks. This study aims to significantly improve diagnostic accuracy, reduce misclassifications, and provide a robust, deployable solution for underdeveloped regions where access to conventional diagnostics and treatment is limited.

Methods: The study developed a hybrid model architecture integrating CNNs with modified Swin Transformer blocks to work seamlessly within the same model.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: Intensive care unit (ICU) clinicians stop antibiotics more often, with a negative infection: point-of-care test (PCR-POCT). Simulated cases of diagnostic uncertainty regarding infection resolution led clinicians to choose options such as procalcitonin (PCT) and/or PCR-POCTs +/- de-escalation to aid stop decisions. We hypothesised that a direct infection indicator, PCR-POCT, would influence stop judgements more than indirect PCT.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Especially in Europe, amino acid PET is increasingly integrated into multidisciplinary neuro-oncological tumor boards (MNTBs) to overcome diagnostic uncertainties such as treatment-related changes. We evaluated the accuracy of MNTB decisions that included the O-(2-[18F]-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET) PET information compared with FET PET results alone to differentiate tumor relapse from treatment-related changes.

Patients And Methods: In a single academic center, we retrospectively evaluated 180 MNTB decisions of 151 patients with CNS WHO grade 3 or 4 gliomas (n = 122) or brain metastases (n = 29) presenting equivocal MRI findings following anticancer treatment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!