A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Left thoracoabdominal approach for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. | LitMetric

Left thoracoabdominal approach for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction.

Hepatogastroenterology

Department of Surgery, Institute of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, 8-1 Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-8666, Japan.

Published: January 2009

Background/aims: To evaluate usefulness of esophagogastrectomy via left thoracoabdominal (LT) approach for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG), the results of surgery stratified by Siewert's classification, were analyzed retrospectively.

Methodology: The tumor diameter, distance of the proximal tumor border from the esophagogastric junction, and length of the esophagus in the resected specimens of consecutive 171 AEG patients were measured. The surgical approach was classified as total esophagectomy (TE), esophagogastrectomy via LT, or transhiatal/abdominal (HA) approach.

Results: Sixteen patients underwent TE, 71 had LT, and 84 had HA. Overall survival of the TE and LT groups was significantly lower than that of the HA group. The difference was seen between LT and HA for type II T3 tumors, but the tumor diameter in LT was significantly larger than that in HA. The approach could not be determined by Siewert's classification, but by distance of proximal tumor border from the junction. The tumors with distance over 5cm might be indicated for the TE approach; 5-3cm, the LT; within 3cm, the HA. The percentage of patients in whom the LT approach is indicated might be only 19%.

Conclusion: Left thoracoabdominal esophagogastrectomy may be valid for some AEG.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

left thoracoabdominal
12
esophagogastric junction
12
thoracoabdominal approach
8
approach adenocarcinoma
8
adenocarcinoma esophagogastric
8
siewert's classification
8
tumor diameter
8
distance proximal
8
proximal tumor
8
tumor border
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!