Background: Advances in medical and surgical therapy in children have resulted in increased survival in children with primary illnesses. However, thrombosis is a serious complication of this success and results in mortality and morbidity. Prevention or treatment of thrombosis using warfarin is challenging in children due to its narrow therapeutic index and the unique differences in children, including variable nutritional intake and the occurrence of common concomitant viral or bacterial illnesses which alter warfarin metabolism. The variable response to warfarin in children necessitates frequent International Normalized Ratio (INR) monitoring. Education may improve time in therapeutic range (TTR) a measure of warfarin effect, and a surrogate for patient adherence, safety and efficacy.
Methods: The Pediatric Anticoagulation program (Stollery Children's Hospital) developed a novel child-focused educational program KIDCLOT-POC about warfarin therapy and POC-INR meter use. A total of twenty eight children, and their caregivers, participated in KIDCLOT-POC. Questionnaire score comparisons and practical demonstrations assessed the learners' theoretical and practical knowledge of warfarin management.
Results: In caregivers, the median pre, post and knowledge retention questionnaire scores were 50 (IQR 27), 93 (IQR 6) (p<0.0001) and 96 (IQR 6) (p<0.0001), respectively. In the 18 children who were >or=6 years of age, post and knowledge retention questionnaire scores were 90 (IQR 16) and 92 (IQR 23) (p=0.44), respectively. The TTR for all children was 81.7% (SD 13.1).
Conclusions: Implementation of KIDCLOT-POC program appears to promote high knowledge development and retention in children and caregivers and high TTR with no adverse events.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2008.07.012 | DOI Listing |
Adv Ther
January 2025
Department of Hospital Medicine, Ochsner Health System, New Orleans, LA, 70121, USA.
Introduction: Atrial fibrillation (AF), a common heart rhythm abnormality, is linked to a higher risk of stroke. Traditionally, warfarin has been the primary anticoagulation treatment for reducing the stroke risk. The new standard of treatment by direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) offers greater benefits including improved efficacy and fewer adverse effects with reduced monitoring.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFComput Biol Med
January 2025
Department of Medicine (HSRD), Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA. Electronic address:
This study highlights the importance of evaluating warfarin dosing in diabetic patients, who require careful anticoagulation management. With rising rates of diabetes and cardiovascular diseases, understanding the factors influencing warfarin therapy is vital for improving patient outcomes and reducing adverse events. Data was sourced from the IWPC dataset, examining characteristics such as age, gender, diabetes status, indication for warfarin, weight, and height.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClin Appl Thromb Hemost
January 2025
Department of Pharmacy Practice, Loma Linda University School of Pharmacy, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Limited available evidence comparing DOACs with warfarin suggests efficacy and safety of DOACs for CVT. We aimed to evaluate whether a specific DOAC is preferred for the treatment of CVT. This retrospective cohort study included adult patients with CVTs between September 2018 and September 2022 treated with a DOAC.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAm J Case Rep
January 2025
Department of Clinical Diagnostic Laboratories, Hospital Al-Sultan Abdullah, Puncak Alam, Selangor, Malaysia.
BACKGROUND Lupus anticoagulants (LA) can interfere with routine coagulation tests such as the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and prothrombin time (PT). The international normalized ratio (INR) is derived from PT and is used to monitor warfarin therapy. A positive LA result is one of the laboratory criteria of the 2023 ACR/EULAR antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) classification criteria.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCochrane Database Syst Rev
January 2025
Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA.
Background: Guideline-recommended strategies to interrupt chronic anticoagulation with warfarin or direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) during the perioperative period of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) surgery differ worldwide. There is uncertainty concerning the benefits and harms of interrupted and uninterrupted anticoagulation in patients undergoing CIED surgery.
Objectives: To assess the benefits and harms of interrupted anticoagulation (IAC) with either warfarin or DOAC in the perioperative period of CIED surgery versus uninterrupted anticoagulation (UAC), with or without heparin bridging, during an equivalent time frame, for CIED surgery.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!