A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Motor performance and motor learning in sustained +3 Gz acceleration. | LitMetric

Motor performance and motor learning in sustained +3 Gz acceleration.

Aviat Space Environ Med

Institute of Physiology and Anatomy, German Sport University Cologne, Köln, Germany.

Published: September 2008

Introduction: Previous studies have shown that increased head-to-foot acceleration (+Gz) like that experienced in maneuvering aircraft impairs motor performance. However, there are few studies of motor performance providing detailed descriptions of specific deficits (e.g., mechanical function, timing, or loss of accuracy), and almost none investigating motor learning processes. Therefore, the present study evaluated whether these parameters may explain tracking deficits during +Gz, and whether +Gz also affects motor learning.

Methods: To investigate motor performance, a Test Group (N = 10) manually tracked a sinusoidal moving target either in normal Earth gravity or during steady-state acceleration (+3 Gz). Cursor feedback was then left-right reversed, and subjects had to adapt their performance to this disturbance while remaining in the same acceleration environment. A Control Group (N = 10) performed the same paradigm in 1 G; a Weight Group (N = 12) also remained at 1 G with additional arm weighting to simulate the +3-Gz load.

Results: Tracking performance in +3 Gz was impaired by about 50% compared to 1-G values. The deficit was not entirely due to the mechanical effect of +3 Gz, since performance in the Weight Group decreased by only about 25%. Moreover, tracking accuracy but not tracking timing was impaired at +3 Gz. Left-right switching resulted in typical motor learning in all subjects. Exposure to +3 Gz had no influence on motor learning.

Discussion: Deficits in tracking performance are probably not due to mechanical impairment or timing deficits, but rather reflect effects on accuracy due to vestibulo-spinal influences or the stressful environment at +3 Gz However, these effects do not impair motor learning.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.3357/asem.2306.2008DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

motor performance
16
motor learning
16
motor
10
weight group
8
tracking performance
8
performance
7
tracking
5
performance motor
4
learning
4
learning sustained
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!