A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for inoperable gastrointestinal liver metastases. | LitMetric

Purpose: Surgery is the most effective treatment for liver metastases. Some patients, however, cannot tolerate this procedure due to co-morbidity, advanced age, site of the lesion or previous liver surgery. In our institution we have now increasing experience with radiofrequency ablation (RFA), a thermo-ablative modality. We compare our outcome and survival results to standard treatments for liver metastases.

Materials And Methods: From April 2000 to June 2005, 30 consecutive patients with liver metastases from gastrointestinal primaries were treated with ultrasound guided RFA for their liver metastases (patients mean age 63.5 years, range 37-80. Size of lesions, range 0.4-6 cm). Main indications were non-operable lesions due to site of the lesion or co-morbidity. RFA was also applied as an additive to liver surgery and as a repetitive palliative treatment. 15 patients underwent one RFA-intervention, 8 patients two, 3 patients three, 1 patient four, 2 patients five and 1 patient six. RFA-interventions (n = 60) were performed either percutaneously (71.5%), in an open approach without liver surgery (22%) or in addition to liver surgery (6.5%).

Results: Mean observation time after first RFA was 23.5 months (range 3-63). Median survival in our patient cohort is 34 months, which compares favourably with results obtained by hepatic resection, the standard of care for liver metastases. Complication rate, attributed to the RFA procedure, was small in our series (5.5%) with one pleural effusion and one abscess formation in the ablated lesion due to underlying bacteraemia.

Conclusion: RFA is an effective and low risk treatment modality in patients with liver metastases. The procedure is safe (complication rate < 6%) with low morbidity. RFA can be performed repeatedly on an outpatient basis with good palliative effects. Of note, surgery remains the treatment of choice in resectable liver metastases of colorectal origin.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1027197DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

liver metastases
28
liver surgery
16
liver
12
radiofrequency ablation
8
rfa
8
ablation rfa
8
patients
8
metastases patients
8
site lesion
8
patients liver
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!