Faces scales are one of the most commonly used instruments to assess pain intensity in children. Most available faces scales present five to seven faces. The present research was conducted to investigate the ability of 4- to 7-year-old children to distinguish the response categories of different faces scales. In the first study, 121 children were asked to rate painful situations on a 3- and a 6-level faces scale commencing with a smiling 'no pain' face. Children were divided into two age groups (4-5 and 6-7 years). Investigations of the category functioning were performed with a rating scale Rasch model for each age group. Results revealed the low performances of the 6-level faces scale as compared to the 3-level faces scale and also the difficulty children experienced in scoring the imaginary painfulness of items. Consequently, a second study was conducted. In this second study, 76 children were asked to rate pictures depicting painful situations on a 3-level faces scale beginning with a neutral 'no pain' face. Results of this second study confirmed an improvement in the ability to distinguish the three response categories with age. The 4-5 year-old children could only distinguish two response categories and the 6-7 year-old children were able to discern the three levels of the 3-level faces scale. In conclusion, young children do not distinguish as many faces as proposed by the majority of available faces scales. These results strongly recommend a reduction in the number of response levels of faces scales for pain assessment in children.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpain.2008.07.004 | DOI Listing |
Today, most research evaluation frameworks are designed to assess mature projects with well-defined data and clearly articulated outcomes. Yet, few, if any, are equipped to evaluate the promise of early-stage research, which is inherently characterized by limited evidence, high uncertainty, and evolving objectives. These early-stage projects require nuanced assessments that can adapt to incomplete information, project maturity, and shifting research questions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnviron Sci Ecotechnol
January 2025
Global Centre for Environmental Remediation (GCER), College of Engineering, Science and Environment, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.
Managing plastic waste is one of the greatest challenges humanity faces in the coming years. Current strategies-landfilling, incineration, and recycling-remain insufficient or pose significant environmental concerns, failing to address the growing volume of plastic residues discharged into the environment. Recently, increasing attention has focused on the potential of certain insect larvae species to chew, consume, and partially biodegrade synthetic polymers such as polystyrene and polyethylene, offering novel biotechnological opportunities for plastic waste management.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Clin Pediatr Dent
December 2024
Department of Pedodontics, Government Dental College, Alappuzha, Kerala, India.
Background: Pain management in pediatric patients during dental procedures is very important. Here, the traditional method of behavior management is compared with novel methods.
Aim: To compare and determine the effectiveness of an external cooling and vibrating device vs counterstimulation with the conventional technique in reducing the fear and discomfort of pediatric dental patients aged 5-7 years during inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB).
Cureus
December 2024
Otolaryngology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Deoghar, IND.
Background and objective Disability assessments are crucial for identifying barriers faced by individuals with disabilities, particularly in countries like India, where disability is often underreported. The Labour Force Survey Disability Module (LFS-DM) is a widely used tool for disability assessment. It is available in English, and Indian Hindi-speaking people who are not proficient in English may face difficulties in responding to it.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPatients' preferences are crucial to formulating personalized treatment plans. We developed a self-reported questionnaire, Therapy Preference Scale (TPS), to examine treatment preferences of patients with cancer. TPS has 30 questions-19 on patients' preferences on safety, quality of life, and treatment effectiveness, 8 questions on importance of various treatment characteristics, and 3 on patients' preferred intent of therapy, expenses, and life expectancy gain.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!