Agreement in patient-physician communication in primary care: a study from Central and Eastern Europe.

Patient Educ Couns

Department of Internal Medicine, General Practice and Oncology, Vilnius University, Lithuania.

Published: November 2008

Objective: Efficient patient-physician collaboration is proven to have a direct benefit on health care outcomes through improved compliance, appointment keeping and use of preventive services. The aim of this study was to evaluate the patient-physician agreement on communication during primary care consultations and consider possible discrepancies.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey using self-administered questionnaires was performed in primary care in four European countries (Lithuania, Slovenia, Serbia and Russia). Post-consultation evaluations of doctor-patient communication were made by patients and physicians and were compared with pre-consultation expectations of the patient. Discrepancies in these evaluations were determined for the entire database, and within groups of expectations, using factor analysis.

Results: One thousand three hundred and thirty-two sets of questionnaires were collected by the study team. In this sample, in more than 90% of consultations physicians and patients agreed about meeting patient expectations. Discrepancies were more likely to be identified when the patients were consulting the physician for the first time or had not seen that physician for more than 12 months (up to 26.1%). There is a significantly lower correlation between the physician recognising patient's unmet expectations for all factors if the physician had been working in Primary Care for between 6 and 10 years (8.6%). The results demonstrate that physicians working more than 16 years in practice are less likely to recognise that they have failed to meet the expectations of patients who are seeking reassurance (9%).

Conclusion: Personal continuity of care is associated with a lower discrepancy between the opinions of patients and physicians regarding meeting patient expectations during consultations in primary care. The highest agreement is within first 6 years in practice, which may reflect long-term effects of training.

Practice Implications: Primary care physicians should put more emphasis on identifying and addressing patient expectations in primary care consultation, including agreement with patient. Existing discrepancies may be considered to be indicators of potential opportunities to improve physician's performance and overall quality of care.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.034DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

primary care
28
patient expectations
12
care
10
communication primary
8
patients physicians
8
meeting patient
8
years practice
8
primary
7
expectations
7
patients
5

Similar Publications

Background: Mental health remains among the top 10 leading causes of disease burden globally, and there is a significant treatment gap due to limited resources, stigma, limited accessibility, and low perceived need for treatment. Problem Management Plus, a World Health Organization-endorsed brief psychological intervention for mental health disorders, has been shown to be effective and cost-effective in various countries globally but faces implementation challenges, such as quality control in training, supervision, and delivery. While digital technologies to foster mental health care have the potential to close treatment gaps and address the issues of quality control, their development requires context-specific, interdisciplinary, and participatory approaches to enhance impact and acceptance.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This study examined the effect of lymphedema self-care patient school education on patient functionality, quality of life, body value, and lymphedema volume in patients with lower extremity lymphedema. The study utilized a single-group quasi-experimental design. The study sample included 21 patients with primary and secondary lower extremity lymphedema.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: This study aimed to investigate loss to follow-up (LFU) rates within breast and cervical cancer screening programs in Kenitra-Morocco, identifying contributing factors from both patient and healthcare worker perspectives to enhance care continuity.

Methods: The study was a non-experimental, mixed-methods design conducted in three-phases. We started by identifying LFU women and their characteristics from medical records, interviewing LFU women to ascertain reasons for discontinuation, and surveying healthcare workers for perceived determinants of LFU through semi-structured questionnaires.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Strategies for Fidelity Monitoring a Solution-Focused Brief Intervention in a Randomized Clinical Trial.

J Clin Psychol Med Settings

January 2025

Department of Family and Preventative Medicine, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Integrated Care (IC) models have increased, but the current mechanisms to analyze the efficacy and fidelity of behavioral interventions within IC models are limited. A mixed methods concurrent process evaluation was used within the context of a randomized clinical trial to assess intervention fidelity for a Solution-focused brief therapy (SFBT) intervention implemented within an IC model. A qualitative content analysis was conducted to develop a participant survey and charting template for the SFBT intervention.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Cervical cancer (CC) is preventable. CC screening decreases CC mortality. Emergency department (ED) patients are at disproportionately high risk for nonadherence with CC screening recommendations.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!