Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Owing to the high prevalence of atherosclerotic coronary artery disease, treatment has proceeded along three separate paths: medical, surgical, and percutaneous intervention. Medical treatment is now routinely combined with both surgical treatment and percutaneous methods; however, the surgical and percutaneous routes are often viewed as in competition. Hybrid coronary revascularization, also called robotic assisted integrated coronary revascularization (RAICER), is a way of combining these two approaches. Whether any hybrid procedure will prove beneficial to patients remains unproven; however, RAICER has promise for reducing short-term complications while providing excellent and enduring treatment for coronary artery disease. Much work remains to be done on the benefits of hybrid revascularization in comparison with conventional bypass surgery or percutaneous coronary procedures.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anclin.2008.03.005 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!