The quality of user-generated health information on consumer health social networking websites has not been studied. We collected a set of postings related to Diabetes Mellitus Type I from three such sites and classified them based on accuracy, error type, and clinical significance of error. We found 48% of postings contained medical content, and 54% of these were either incomplete or contained errors. About 85% of the incomplete and erroneous messages were potentially clinically significant.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

consumer health
8
health social
8
quality user-generated
8
user-generated health
8
patient-centered consumer
4
health
4
social network
4
network websites
4
websites pilot
4
pilot study
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!