Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The work reported in this paper investigates the use of a decision-support tool for the diagnosis of pigmented skin lesions in a real-world clinical trial with 511 patients and 3827 lesion evaluations. We analyzed a number of outcomes of the trial, such as direct comparison of system performance in laboratory and clinical setting, the performance of physicians using the system compared to a control dermatologist without the system, and repeatability of system recommendations. The results show that system performance was significantly less in the real-world setting compared to the laboratory setting (c-index of 0.87 vs. 0.94, p = 0.01). Dermatologists using the system achieved a combined sensitivity of 85% and combined specificity of 95%. We also show that the process of acquiring lesion images using digital dermoscopy devices needs to be standardized before sufficiently high repeatability of measurements can be assured.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2655775 | PMC |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!