A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Two cardiovascular risk factors in one? Homocysteine and its relation to glomerular filtration rate. A meta-analysis of 41 studies with 27,000 participants. | LitMetric

Background: Hyperhomocysteinemia is thought to be an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease, but the association between renal dysfunction and homocysteine may not have been fully taken into account. We performed a meta-analysis of studies that report correlations between glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and homocysteine plasma levels.

Methods: Using a prespecified research strategy, we identified 41 studies involving 26,617 participants that reported Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficients for the association between 1/GFR and homocysteine. The summary correlation coefficients with 95% CI were obtained by pooling the logarithmic Z values derived from the individual trial correlation coefficients. Subgroup analysis was performed to compare results for measured GFR using clearance methods and various estimates of GFR.

Results: The pooled correlation coefficient between homocysteine and 1/GFR was 0.37 (CI 0.32-0.40, p < 0.0001). The correlation coefficient based on various estimates of GFR was 0.33 (CI 0.29-0.38, p < 0.0001), and for measured GFR it was 0.45 (CI 0.39-0.51, p < 0.0001). The correlation coefficient was higher when GFR was measured using clearance methods compared with various estimates GFR (1.36 [CI 1.13-1.65], p = 0.0014).

Conclusions: Homocysteine plasma levels significantly depend on renal function. This correlation is even more robust when GFR is measured using clearance methods. Therefore, in order to assess whether homocysteine is an independent cardiovascular risk factor, accurate adjustments for renal dysfunction are essential.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000142725DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

correlation coefficients
12
clearance methods
12
correlation coefficient
12
cardiovascular risk
8
glomerular filtration
8
filtration rate
8
meta-analysis studies
8
risk factor
8
renal dysfunction
8
homocysteine plasma
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!