Mobilising public opinion for the tobacco industry: the Consumer Tax Alliance and excise taxes.

Tob Control

Tufts University, Community Health Program, 112 Packard Avenue, Medford, MA 02155, USA.

Published: October 2008

AI Article Synopsis

  • The tobacco industry funded the creation of the Consumer Tax Alliance in 1989 to oppose excise taxes by framing them as regressive, while hiding its involvement to mislead the public.
  • The study aimed to analyze the alliance's formation and activities as a unique interest group, providing insights for tobacco control and public health advocates to recognize unexpected coalitions from the tobacco industry.
  • Findings revealed the Tobacco Institute's strategy to align with liberal groups to sway public opinion against cigarette tax increases, highlighting the need for advocates to be aware of how funding sources can manipulate agendas and influence policy-making.

Article Abstract

Background: Tobacco industry funding was instrumental in creating and financing the Consumer Tax Alliance in 1989 as an organisation that relied upon extensive media outreach to build opposition to excise taxes as a regressive form of taxation. By obscuring its own role in this effort, the tobacco industry undermined the public's reasonable expectations for transparency in the policy-making process.

Aim: To examine the formation and activities of the Consumer Tax Alliance as a "hybrid" form of interest group in order to provide tobacco control and public health advocates with a better understanding of unanticipated tobacco industry coalitions and facilitate appropriate countermeasures.

Methods: Document searches through the Legacy Tobacco Documents Library and through Tobacco Documents Online and review of background literature.

Results: The Tobacco Institute actively sought liberal allies beginning in the mid-1980s in seeking to build public opposition to cigarette excise tax increases by promoting them as a regressive form of taxation. The creation of the Consumer Tax Alliance in 1989 was expressly intended to turn labour and middle-class opinion against prospective excise tax increases in federal budget deficit negotiations, without divulging the tobacco industry's role in its formation.

Conclusion: It is important to understand the dynamic by which trusted organisations can be induced to alter their agendas in response to funding sources. Advocates need to understand this form of interest group behaviour so that they are better able to negotiate the policy arena by diagnosing and exposing this influence where it occurs and, by doing so, be better prepared to take appropriate countermeasures.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2772174PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tc.2008.025338DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

tobacco industry
16
consumer tax
16
tax alliance
16
tobacco
9
excise taxes
8
alliance 1989
8
regressive form
8
form taxation
8
form interest
8
interest group
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!