The aim of this study was to reduce the door-to-needle time in patients with ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction by setting up a chest pain service. We compared the door-to-needle time and outcomes at the end of first year of follow-up in patients who received fibrinolysis in the 2 years before implementation of the service (Group 1) and those who received fibrinolysis in the 2 years after its creation (Group 2). In Group 1, the median door-to-needle time was 40 min (P(25-75), 23-52 min); in Group 2, it was 27 min (P(25-75), 15-43 min; P=.003). In addition, the use of reperfusion therapy increased from 55.2% in Group 1 to 64.7% in Group 2 (P< .01). After a follow-up period of 1 year, there was no difference in the rate of revascularization, hospital readmission, reinfarction or cardiovascular mortality.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

door-to-needle time
16
outcomes year
8
received fibrinolysis
8
fibrinolysis years
8
min p25-75
8
group
6
reduction door-to-needle
4
time
4
time meet
4
meet clinical
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!