Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Effects of an injectable emulsion of propofol and its emulsifier on singlet oxygen (1O2) were examined. 1O2 released from activated human neutrophils was detected by chemiluminescence, and chemically generated 1O2 was detected by electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR). Both the propofol emulsion and the emulsifier suppressed 1O2 release from neutrophils. However, the emulsifier did not quench chemically generated 1O2, while the propofol emulsion quenched it. These results indicated that the emulsifier did not scavenge 1O2 released from neutrophils but inhibited 1O2 generation. The suppressive effects of propofol emulsion on 1O2 release from neutrophils consist of 1O2 scavenging and inhibition of 1O2 generation.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1254/jphs.08040sc | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!