Should my new curing light be an LED?

Oper Dent

Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.

Published: October 2008

The new generation LED curing light units have significantly improved curing performance compared to first generation lights, and even some second generation LED curing light units. This study compared the curing performance of 10 new generation LED light curing units (FLASH-lite 1401, LE Demetron 1, Coltolux, Ultra-Lume 5, Mini LED, bluephase, Elipar FreeLight 2, Radii, Smartlite IQ and Allegro) for depth of cure against a high-powered halogen curing light unit (Optilux 501). Depth of cure measurements were utilized per the ANSI/ADA No 27 standard to detect differences between the lights at three time intervals (10, 20 and 40 seconds). A total of 660 samples were prepared (n=10/group). A full factorial ANOVA and Tukey's HSD test showed FLASH-lite 1401 performed significantly better than the other lights at 10- and 20-second time intervals (p<0.01). This study also demonstrated that an exposure time of 20 seconds or longer assures a better depth of cure, 40 seconds being the optimal polymerization time for all of the curing light units.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.2341/07-103DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

curing light
16
generation led
12
led curing
8
light units
8
curing performance
8
flash-lite 1401
8
depth cure
8
time intervals
8
curing
7
light led?
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!