Mid-century controversies in population genetics.

Annu Rev Genet

Genetics Laboratory, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA.

Published: February 2009

Beginning in the 1930s, evolution became an experimental subject. New techniques, especially in Drosophila, made possible quantitative analysis of natural populations. In addition to a large number of studies on many species, there were four major controversies that dominated much of the discussion and experimentation. Some of the arguments were quite heated. These controversies were: Wright vs Fisher on Wright's shifting-balance theory; dominance vs overdominance as an explanation of heterosis; the classical vs balance hypothesis for genetic variability; the neutral theory of molecular evolution. Curiously, most of these issues were not really resolved. Rather they were abandoned in favor of more tractable studies made possible by the new molecular methods.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genet.42.110807.091612DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mid-century controversies
4
controversies population
4
population genetics
4
genetics 1930s
4
1930s evolution
4
evolution experimental
4
experimental subject
4
subject techniques
4
techniques drosophila
4
drosophila quantitative
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!