The emotion management subscale of the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) has recently been recommended by the National Institute of Mental Health Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia committee as the sole measure of social cognition for trials of cognitive enhancement in schizophrenia, yet the psychometric properties of this subscale and the larger instrument in schizophrenia patients have not been thoroughly examined. This research presents a psychometric investigation of the MSCEIT in a sample of 64 early course outpatients with schizophrenia, schizoaffective, or schizophreniform disorder. Results demonstrated that the MSCEIT possesses adequate internal consistency reliability among its branch and total scales and that patients' branch and overall test performance was significantly below normative levels. Estimates of discriminant and concurrent validity indicated that the MSCEIT diverged from measures of neurocognitive functioning and psychopathology, but was only modestly related with objective measures of functional outcome. Convergent validity estimates suggested that, contrary to expectations, the MSCEIT did not correlate with a behavioral measure of social cognition. Finally, exploratory factor analyses suggested the possibility of a shift in the latent structure of emotional intelligence in schizophrenia, compared with studies with healthy individuals. These findings support the use of the MSCEIT as a reliable and potentially valid method of assessing the emotional components of social cognition in schizophrenia, but also point to a need for additional measurement development efforts to assess broader social-cognitive domains that may exhibit stronger relations with functional outcome. Further investigation is warranted to examine the instrument's latent factor structure and convergence with other measures of social cognition.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2833113 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbn091 | DOI Listing |
J Cogn
January 2025
Departamento de Psicología Básica, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain.
Research on unconscious processing has been a valuable source of evidence in psycholinguistics for shedding light on the cognitive architecture of language. The automaticity of syntactic processing, in particular, has long been debated. One strategy to establish this automaticity involves detecting significant syntactic priming effects in tasks that limit conscious awareness of the stimuli.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNat Ment Health
January 2025
Methods of Plasticity Research, Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Atypical face processing is commonly reported in autism. Its neural correlates have been explored extensively across single neuroimaging modalities within key regions of the face processing network, such as the fusiform gyrus (FFG). Nonetheless, it is poorly understood how variation in brain anatomy and function jointly impacts face processing and social functioning.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis
January 2025
College of Medicine and Public Health, School of Medicine, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Compr Psychoneuroendocrinol
November 2024
School of Social Sciences, University of Westminster, London, UK.
Cortisol awakening response (CAR) research relies upon self-collected saliva sampling during the post-awakening period. It is unknown how the CAR protocol is perceived and how they may affect typical routines relevant to CAR methodology. CAR assessment is sensitive to state variables, suggesting that CAR measurement may be affected by research participation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClin Rehabil
January 2025
Multidisciplinary Specialist Centre for Brain Injury and Neuropsychiatry, GGZ Oost Brabant, Boekel, the Netherlands.
Objective: To examine the experiences of individuals with acquired brain injury and their partners regarding the effects of social cognition problems on their relationships.
Design: Qualitative interview study.
Setting: Interviews were conducted 1 to 5 years post-injury, either in the participants' home or at a care facility in the Netherlands.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!