[Comparative study between manitol 10% and polyethyleneglycol [corrected] in colonoscopic preparation in inpatients of FAP Central Hospital].

Introduction: In search alternatives for colonoscopic preparation, we decided to compare the effectiveness, safety and tolerance of the use of 10% manitol with polyethyleneglycol.

Methods: A prospective, randomized and simple blind study was performed. Eighty consecutive inpatients were prospectively randomized to receive bowel preparation for elective colonoscopy with either 1 liter of 10% manitol (M Group, n=40) or 4 liters of polyethyleneglycol (PEG Group, n=40). Criteria of evaluation were quality of preparation, pre and post preparation laboratory seric test (sodium, potassium, osmolarity) and the presence of undesirable side effects during the preparation.

Results: Both groups were comparable in age, sex and colonoscopic indications. There was no difference between both groups when evaluating the quality of preparation: good or excellent preparation of 87.5% (manitol Group) and 90% (PEG Group) (p=0.37). The frequency of adverse effects was minor in group manitol (30%) that in group PEG (42.5%), being the nausea the most frequent symptom in both groups. A slight increase in the levels of sodium, potassium and osmolarity serums was found in both groups, without statistical difference or clinical repercussion.

Conclusions: The preparation for colon cleansing with 10% manitol is as effective and safe, but better tolerated and accepted than preparation with PEG. 10% manitol would be a good alternative for colonoscopic preparation, specially for diagnostic procedures.