AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study investigated the accuracy of bedside chest radiographs (CXRs) for determining the position of central venous catheters (CVCs) in intensive care patients by comparing them to transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) results.
  • - Radiologists assessed the CXR images of 213 adults undergoing cardiothoracic surgery, and only a small percentage had CVC tips in the upper right atrium, indicating that CXRs might not be reliable.
  • - The research found that a specific measurement known as TC-distance could help identify correct CVC placement, with a TC-distance of 55 mm or less indicating accurate positioning similar to experienced radiologists.

Article Abstract

Background: Traditionally, the positioning of central venous catheters (CVCs) outside the right atrium (RA) in patients receiving intensive care is determined by surrogate landmarks on bedside chest radiographs (CXRs). The validity of this method was examined by comparing readings of radiologists with the results of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE).

Methods: Prospective study at university hospital. Two hundred thirteen adults scheduled for cardiothoracic surgery were randomized to right or left internal jugular vein catheterization under ECG guidance. One senior radiologist and two radiologists in training independently read the CXRs, and determined whether the CVC tip ended in the RA and measured the vertical distance from the CVC tip to the carina (TC-distance).

Results: Two hundred twelve CVC tips could be identified by TEE. Only left-sided CVCs (n = 5) ended in the upper RA (2.4%). Three of those patients were shorter than 160 cm. Specificity was 94% for senior radiologist, 44% for the first radiologist in training, and 60% for the second radiologist in training. The TC-distance of intraatrial catheters was 39, 55, 59, 80, and 83 mm, respectively. Thus, a TC-distance < or = 55 mm ensured extraatrial tip position in four of five intraatrial CVCs (80%, p = 0.002). The TC-distance of extraatrial catheters ranged from - 26 to 102 mm.

Conclusions: Reading of a bedside CXR alone is not very accurate to identify intraatrial CVC tip position. TC-distance is a helpful marker, and its specificity is as good as that of an experienced radiologist if a cutoff value of 55 mm is chosen.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1378/chest.07-2687DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

reading bedside
8
bedside chest
8
central venous
8
senior radiologist
8
radiologist training
8
radiologist
5
traditional reading
4
chest radiograph
4
radiograph appropriate
4
appropriate detect
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!