A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Predictability of prebent advancement plates for use in maxillomandibular advancement surgery. | LitMetric

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the predictability when using prebent advancement (PBA) plates in the maxillary osteotomies of maxillomandibular advancement (MMA) surgery.

Materials And Methods: A retrospective review of the MMA surgeries at University of Alabama at Birmingham was carried out. Thirty-six obstructive sleep apnea patients who underwent MMA with PBA were included in this study. All cases had fixation of the maxillary osteotomies with KLS Martin PBA titanium plates and screws (KLS Martin, Jacksonville, FL). Lateral cephalometric radiographs were taken within 1 month before surgery (T1), and between 2 to 4 weeks postsurgically (T2). All cephalometric radiographs were analyzed using Planmeca Dimaxis Imaging Software (Helsinki, Finland). Vertical and horizontal measurements were made to several skeletal landmarks including Sella (S), A point (APT), and upper incisor (UPI). The amount of advancement was measured through pre- and postoperative lateral cephalographs and compared with the magnitude of the advancement plates used.

Results: All data of 36 patients were included and used for statistics. The data showed that the mean difference was 0.74 mm (advancement is more than the size of the PBA plates) and the mean percentage difference was 11.35%. Fifty percent of the cases had the magnitude of advancement within 1 mm of the PBA size. The predictive analysis found that the PBA size was a significant predictor for the advancement achieved (P < .0001) but not the absolute difference between the advancement achieved and the plate size (P = .0726) and the relative advancement difference (P = .0612). The absolute difference and the relative difference take into account the size of the PBA and are better parameters to judge the predictability of the advancement achieved. The rationale for this unpredictability is largely due to the anatomy of the maxilla and pyriform rims and the adaptation of the PBA to the maxilla.

Conclusion: There are distinct advantages to the use of PBA plates. The PBA plates have been proven to significantly affect the advancement. However, when very precise movements are required, the size of the PBA used does not predictably correlate to and frequently underestimates the amount of advancement achieved. Therefore accurate model surgeries are still required for most cases.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2007.11.034DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pba plates
16
advancement achieved
16
advancement
14
size pba
12
pba
11
predictability prebent
8
prebent advancement
8
advancement plates
8
maxillomandibular advancement
8
advancement pba
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!