Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Current anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody screening immunoassays are routinely based on an indirect format. Although their use for anti-HCV antibody detection has achieved a very high specificity and sensitivity, false-positive results are still a problem especially among populations with a low prevalence of HCV infection. One strategy to obviate this problem is to adapt the assay from an indirect format to a double-antigen sandwich one to further improve its specificity. In this study, a double-antigen sandwich time-resolved immunofluorometric assay (DAS-TRIFMA) has been developed to detect total anti-HCV antibodies based on biotin-streptavidin interaction. For comparison, 1025 samples were analysed by the DAS-TRIFMA and three indirect anti-HCV antibody detection methods. For samples with discordant results, PCR-ELISA and Inno-LIA were employed as supplementary assays to analyse the presence of HCV antibodies. With regard to the 1025 clinical samples, the overall concordance between the DAS-TRIFMA and the three indirect methods was 99.41, 98.93 and 98.93 % for Ortho ELISA 3.0, WAT ELISA and I-TRIFMA, respectively. The specificity/sensitivity of the DAS-TRIFMA, Ortho HCV ELISA 3.0, WAT HCV ELISA and I-TRIFMA were 100/99.09, 99.34/98.18, 99.23/97.27 and 99.01 %/98.18 %, respectively. The DAS-TRIFMA was able to detect HCV antibodies at a concentration about 1/10 of that detectable by indirect methods. From the obtained results and their comparison, it is concluded that the DAS-TRIFMA is a more specific and reliable method for screening anti-HCV antibodies, and weakly positive S/Co values by the DAS-TRIFMA were more predictive of HCV infection than those by indirect methods.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.47835-0 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!