Comparison of pressure effects on adjacent disk levels after 2-level lumbar constructs: fusion, hybrid, and total disk replacement.

Background: With increasing advocacy for the use of TDR procedure as a surgical alternative to fusion in the management of lumbar DDD, intradiskal pressures at the adjacent levels of spine have generated considerable interest. The common belief is that adjacent-level disk pressures will be lower after a TDR as opposed to conventional fusion. The aim of this study is to present the effect of different constructs on adjacent-level disk pressures in lumbar spine. We hypothesized that the adjacent-segment disk pressures after 1- and 2-level TDR and/or a fusion-TDR hybrid procedure will show significant variance within physiological range of motion.

Methods: Six adult spine segments T12-S1 with intact ligaments were harvested from cadavers and held firmly in a specially designed fixture. Intradiskal pressures, in motions of flexion, extension, and lateral bending, at L2-L3 and L3-L4 were measured using needle transducers after 2-level TDR L4 through S1, hybrid procedure, and 2-level fusion L4-S1 with femoral ring allograft and pedicle screws.

Results: The pressures with lateral bending were not significantly lower than those with flexion and extension at both levels (P = .18). Although TDR and hybrid specimens recorded slightly lower pressures specifically during lateral bending, no statistical difference in pressures could be detected when movements were combined with various procedures.

Conclusion: Contrary to the assumed hypothesis, the pressures at the adjacent-level disks (L3-4 and L2-3) did not depend upon the stabilization procedure (2-level disk replacement, hybrid, or 2-level fusion) performed after 2-level diskectomy in the lumbosacral spine.