Aim: In this study, we examine the evolution of tradition concerning infant male circumcision, utilizing evidence from classical medical texts as well as information from literature, legal sources and art.
Methods: We examined the differences in the representation of male circumcision between ancient times and the modern era.
Results: Through the ages, male circumcision has been differently represented, and at present an interesting representation is born following the natural evolution of society.
Conclusion: Based on the fact that the foreskin is not a defect, the impact of male circumcision is on the child's rights and its role during first years of life still remains controversial.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2008.00917.x | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!