Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
A large scale screening of the in vitro susceptibility of 105 strains of Prototheca zopfii to a panel of polyene antibiotics (amphotericin B, nystatin, primaricin and filipin) was conducted. Strains studied were isolated from dairy-associated environments in five different localities. Groups 1-4 included strains recovered from four separate regions of Italy, while group 5 included isolates from Belgium. Amphotericin B and primaricin exhibited the highest activity, with th MIC90 ranging from 4 and 8 microg/ml, respectively. On the other hand, the MIC90 of nystatin and filipin were from two to four times higher. Two strains were resistant to all four polyenes tested. The above results are compared with those in the literature and the importance of carrying out large-scale screening surveys to assess polyene susceptibility patterns within the species P. zopfii is discussed.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13693780801993611 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!