Mild Epicureanism: notes toward the definition of a therapeutic attitude.

Am J Psychother

Department of Psychology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel.

Published: August 2008

Psychotherapists generally feel uncomfortable addressing patients' beliefs, particularly religious beliefs, because of the desire to respect client subjectivity and to avoid the abuse of therapeutic authority. This paper's first contention is that at some junctures, investigation of the client's belief structure can be an important catalyst for change, as exemplified by an extended case example. This stance assumes that much of the individual and collective damage rigid belief systems inflict derives from their function as a defense against death awareness, as described by terror management theory. The paper develops the concept of a therapeutic meta-attitude towards belief mild Epicureanism, related to the classical Greek philosopher Epicurus (341-270 BC). Mild Epicureanism means to soften attachments to all belief systems, even therapeutic theories, to lower their potential inhibition of personal growth. The paper presents the argument that mild Epicureanism is consistent with most therapeutic approaches, and allows addressing clients' belief without interfering with their right to make up their own minds.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.2008.62.2.195DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mild epicureanism
16
belief systems
8
therapeutic
5
belief
5
mild
4
epicureanism notes
4
notes definition
4
definition therapeutic
4
therapeutic attitude
4
attitude psychotherapists
4

Similar Publications

Mild Epicureanism: notes toward the definition of a therapeutic attitude.

Am J Psychother

August 2008

Department of Psychology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel.

Psychotherapists generally feel uncomfortable addressing patients' beliefs, particularly religious beliefs, because of the desire to respect client subjectivity and to avoid the abuse of therapeutic authority. This paper's first contention is that at some junctures, investigation of the client's belief structure can be an important catalyst for change, as exemplified by an extended case example. This stance assumes that much of the individual and collective damage rigid belief systems inflict derives from their function as a defense against death awareness, as described by terror management theory.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!