A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

[What is the clinical practice of partial nephrectomy in France?]. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study assesses the practice and outcomes of partial nephrectomy (PN) across seven French University Hospitals, focusing on morbidity and cancer control.
  • A total of 741 cases were analyzed, revealing that most tumors were around 3.4 cm in size, with 12.2% of procedures done laparoscopically and an average operation time of 151 minutes.
  • Results indicated a 3.5% local recurrence rate and a 4.5% specific death rate at an average follow-up of 38 months, emphasizing PN as a growing and effective option for treating renal tumors under 4 cm.

Article Abstract

Objective: To describe the practice of partial nephrectomy (PN) in France and assess its results in terms of morbidity and cancer control.

Material And Method: Seven French University Hospitals in which nephron sparing surgery represents at least 30% of the total number of nephrectomies for renal tumour, participated in this study. All centres included, as exhaustively as possible, all their PN cases. For each patient, 70 variables were harvested in order to characterize the patient population, the indications, the operative technique, the per- and postoperative course and complications, the tumor specificities, the carcinologic control and renal function follow-up.

Results: Seven hundred and forty-one PN, of which 579 for malignant tumours were analysed. The mean tumour size was 3.4+/-2.1 cm (0.1-18) and 20.8% of the tumours were larger than 4 cm. In 30.1% of cases, the indication was imperative. Among the PN, 12.2% were performed laparoscopically. The mean operating time was 151+/-54.2 min (55-420). The medical and surgical complications rates were respectively 15.2 and 14.7%. At a mean 38 months follow-up, the local recurrence rate was 3.5% and the specific death rate was 4.5%.

Conclusion: PN is nowadays getting a more and more widely used technique in France. This expansion is completely justified by its results and urologists must consider nephron sparing surgery as the gold standard treatment for renal tumours measuring less than 4 cm.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.purol.2008.04.012DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

practice partial
8
partial nephrectomy
8
nephron sparing
8
sparing surgery
8
[what clinical
4
clinical practice
4
nephrectomy france?]
4
france?] objective
4
objective describe
4
describe practice
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!