AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to assess the impact of sedation and analgesia scales on patient experience and outcomes in an intensive care unit, specifically focusing on those receiving mechanical ventilation.
  • Before and after the introduction of the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale and the Behavioral Pain Scale, data was collected over a year to compare patient experiences.
  • Results showed no significant change in overall mechanical ventilation duration, but those requiring longer ventilation (96+ hours) experienced extended times after scale implementation, indicating mixed results regarding sedation effectiveness and patient care.

Article Abstract

Background: Sedation and analgesia scales promote a less-distressing experience in the intensive care unit and minimize complications for patients receiving mechanical ventilation.

Objectives: To evaluate outcomes before and after introduction of scales for sedation and analgesia in a general intensive care unit.

Method: A before-and-after design was used to evaluate introduction of the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale and the Behavioral Pain Scale for patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Data were collected for 6 months before and 6 months after training in and introduction of the scales.

Results: A total of 769 patients received mechanical ventilation for at least 6 hours (369 patients before and 400 patients after implementation). Age, scores on the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II, and diagnostic groups were similar in the 2 groups, but the after group had more men than did the before group. Duration of mechanical ventilation did not change significantly after the scales were introduced (median, 24 vs 28 hours). For patients who received mechanical ventilation for 96 hours or longer (24%), mechanical ventilation lasted longer after implementation of the scales (P=.03). Length of stay in the intensive care unit was similar in the 2 groups (P= .18), but patients received sedatives for longer after implementation (P=.01). By logistic regression analysis, APACHE II score (P<.001) and diagnostic group (P<.001) were independent predictors of mechanical ventilation lasting 96 hours or longer.

Conclusion: Sedation and analgesia scales did not reduce duration of ventilation in an Australian intensive care unit.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mechanical ventilation
24
intensive care
16
care unit
12
patients received
12
duration mechanical
8
sedation analgesia
8
patients receiving
8
receiving mechanical
8
received mechanical
8
ventilation hours
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!