Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: Individuals with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have poor sleep quality. This study evaluated the effects of ramelteon, an MT(1)/MT(2) melatonin receptor agonist indicated for insomnia treatment on respiration in this population.
Materials And Methods: This double-blind, crossover study enrolled 25 subjects (>or=40 years) with moderate to severe COPD (FEV(1)/FVC <70% and FEV(1) between 50 and 80% of predicted value [moderate], or FEV(1)/FVC <70% and FEV(1) <50% of predicted value [severe]). Subjects received ramelteon 8 mg or placebo for one night 30 min before polysomnographic monitoring, including measurement of oxygen saturation (SaO(2)) and respiratory effort and flow. Subjects crossed to alternate treatment after a 5- to 10-day washout. The primary endpoint was mean SaO(2) for the entire night.
Results: No significant difference in SaO(2) for the entire night was observed with ramelteon vs placebo (92.2% vs 92.5%, P = 0.576). Mean SaO(2) was similar between ramelteon and placebo for each hour of the night, each sleep stage, the number of minutes that SaO(2) was <80% and <90%, and mean apnea-hypopnea index. There was a significant difference in total sleep time (389.0 vs 348.4 min, P = 0.019) and sleep efficiency (81.0 vs 72.6%, P = 0.019), and latency to persistent sleep was shorter (23.1 vs 56.9 min, P = 0.051), with ramelteon vs placebo. All adverse events were mild to moderate; none led to study discontinuation.
Conclusion: Ramelteon did not produce respiratory depressant effects as measured by oxygenation or abnormal breathing events in subjects with moderate to severe COPD. Ramelteon was well tolerated in this population.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11325-008-0196-4 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!