AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to compare the effectiveness of computed tomography colonography (CTC) versus colonoscopy in detecting colorectal polyps in asymptomatic adults in Korea to assess CTC's potential as a screening tool.
  • A total of 241 participants underwent both CTC and colonoscopy, with results showing that CTC had lower sensitivity for detecting larger polyps compared to colonoscopy, particularly struggling with flat polyps.
  • The findings suggest that CTC is not a reliable screening option in Korea, and the type of bowel preparation used significantly influenced the accuracy of CTC.

Article Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare the sensitivity of computed tomography (CT) colonography (CTC) with that of colonoscopy for detecting patients with colorectal polyps in an asymptomatic screening population in Korea, thus to evaluate a possibility, whether CTC could be used as a screening tool for colorectal polyps.

Methods: A total of 241 asymptomatic adults underwent intravenous contrast-enhanced CTC and colonoscopy successively on the same day. Bowel preparation was performed by 4 L of polyethylene glycol (n=172) or 90 mL of sodium phosphate (n=69). The CTC findings were released to the colonoscopists after the first examination of each segment, a procedure known as segmental unblinded colonoscopy, and were used as the reference standard. The diagnostic performance of CTC for colorectal polyps was calculated.

Results: The per-patient sensitivities of CTC were 68.5% (37/54) and 86.7% (13/15) for polyp > or = 6 and > or = 10 mm, inferior to those of colonoscopy, 92.6% (50/54) and 100% (15/15), respectively. The per-polyp sensitivities of CTC were 60.4% (61/101) and 72.7% (16/22) for polyp > or = 6 and > or = 10 mm, respectively. The low sensitivity of CTC was related with flat morphology. CTC detected only 37.5% (9/24) of flat polyps > or = 6 mm. Bowel preparation by sodium phosphate further decreased the positive predictive value and specificity than by polyethylene glycol.

Conclusions: Screening by CTC with asymptomatic population was not promising in Korea despite using advanced CT technology (16-row detector). Bowel preparation was one of the key determinants of the specificity of CTC.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0b013e31811edcb7DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

colorectal polyps
12
bowel preparation
12
ctc
11
intravenous contrast-enhanced
8
detecting patients
8
patients colorectal
8
polyps asymptomatic
8
asymptomatic population
8
population korea
8
ctc colonoscopy
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!