AI Article Synopsis

  • To evaluate wrist cartilage integrity for motion-preserving procedures in arthritis, wrist arthroscopy is essential for direct visualization.
  • Over a year, 20 patients with wrist pain were examined using MRI and wrist arthroscopy, with Kappa analysis comparing the two methods.
  • The study found only a fair correlation (K = 0.38) between MRI and arthroscopy, indicating that while both methods are important, they are not equivalent for assessing wrist cartilage.

Article Abstract

In order to perform motion-preserving procedures for wrist arthritis rather than total joint fusion, it is important to determine the integrity of specific areas of wrist cartilage. This is generally performed using a wrist arthroscope and by directly visualising the cartilage. Twenty patients with wrist pain were investigated over a 1-year period with both MRI and wrist arthroscopy. Kappa analysis was used to compare the two methods of cartilage assessment. There is only a fair correlation (K = 0.38) between the two methods. With only a fair correlation between arthroscopy and MRI, it cannot be concluded that the two methods are equivalent for assessing wrist cartilage and, as such, wrist arthroscopy still has an important role to play in the assessment of a painful degenerative wrist.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1753193408090395DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

wrist arthroscopy
12
wrist cartilage
12
wrist
10
mri wrist
8
fair correlation
8
cartilage
5
comparison mri
4
arthroscopy
4
arthroscopy assessment
4
assessment wrist
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!