Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 143
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 143
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 209
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 994
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3134
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 574
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 488
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: There is little experience with the (neuro) psychological treatment of patients with solvent-induced chronic toxic encephalopathy (CSE). In this randomised controlled trial (RCT), a treatment programme was evaluated based on previous outcome studies of patients with chronic fatigue, whiplash and traumatic brain damage.
Methods: The treatment consisted of 8 group sessions based on cognitive behavioural principles focusing on inadequate illness behaviours, and 8 sessions of cognitive strategy training to compensate memory problems. The research design was an RCT with follow-up, comparing the cumulative effect of the 2 interventions allocated in random order with a waiting-list control group. Outcome measures were treatment satisfaction, self-ratings of psychosocial and cognitive changes, psychosocial and memory questionnaires and neuropsychological tests. Multiple linear regression analyses were performed with baseline scores, treatment versus control condition, effort status, and litigation or financial compensation status as predictors.
Results: Ninety-five patients started treatment, 84 patients had complete data. Treatment satisfaction was high. After the treatment, only the treatment group had improved on objective memory tests and on complaints related to CSE, but not on other questionnaires. Treatment effects diminished at follow-up. Insufficient effort and litigation were negatively associated with treatment outcome.
Conclusions: The positive treatment effects on the cognitive tests were only temporary. It might be important to study the effect of booster sessions to update practiced cognitive strategies. Effort was an important predictor of success, more important than involvement in a litigation procedure. This finding should have implications for the selection of patients.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000140088 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!