Background: Although EUS-guided cyst-gastrostomy is increasingly being performed, there are no studies that compare the clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness with surgical cyst-gastrostomy.
Objectives: To compare the clinical outcomes of EUS-guided cyst-gastrostomy with surgical cyst-gastrostomy for the management of patients with uncomplicated pancreatic pseudocysts and to perform a cost analysis of each treatment modality.
Design: A retrospective case-controlled study.
Setting: A tertiary-referral center.
Patients: Consecutive patients with uncomplicated pancreatic pseudocysts managed by surgical and EUS-guided cyst-gastrostomy.
Methods: An independent observer blinded to all clinic outcomes matched each patient who underwent a surgical cyst-gastrostomy with 2 patients who underwent an EUS-guided cyst-gastrostomy for age, etiology of pancreatitis, and the size of the pseudocyst.
Main Outcome Measurements: Rates of treatment success, complications, and reinterventions; length of postprocedure hospital stay; and cost associated with each treatment modality.
Results: Ten patients (6 men; mean age 42.3 years, range 22-65 years) who underwent surgical cyst-gastrostomy were matched with 20 patients who underwent an EUS-guided cyst-gastrostomy. There were no significant differences in demographics, major comorbidities, and clinical characteristics between both cohorts. Although there were no significant differences in rates of treatment success (100% vs 95%, P = .36), procedural complications (none in either cohort), or reinterventions (10% vs 0%, P = .13) between surgery versus an EUS-guided cyst-gastrostomy, the mean length of a postprocedure hospital stay for an EUS-guided cyst-gastrostomy was significantly shorter than for surgical cyst-gastrostomy (2.65 vs 6.5 days, P = .008). The average direct cost per case for EUS-guided cyst-gastrostomy was significantly less when compared with surgical cyst-gastrostomy ($9077 vs $14,815, P = .01), which corresponded to a cost savings of $5738 per patient.
Limitations: Retrospective, nonrandomized design; patients with pancreatic abscess or necrosis were not evaluated; a limited sample size and a short duration of follow-up.
Conclusions: EUS-guided cyst-gastrostomy should be considered as a first-line treatment approach for patients with uncomplicated pancreatic pseudocysts, because the procedure is cost saving and is associated with a shorter length of a postprocedure hospital stay when compared with surgical cyst-gastrostomy. There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between both treatment modalities.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2008.02.057 | DOI Listing |
Children (Basel)
May 2024
Department of Pediatric Surgery, ASST Spedali Civili Children's Hospital, 25123 Brescia, Italy.
Endosc Ultrasound
January 2021
Gastroenterology Division, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Endosc Ultrasound
January 2020
University of Utah School of Medicine, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
World J Gastrointest Endosc
September 2017
Department of Pancreatic surgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China.
Aim: To compare efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided and surgical drainage in pancreatic fluid collection management.
Methods: Data were obtained retrospectively from January 2012 to December 2016. Patients with pancreatic fluid collection were performed EUS-guided or surgical procedure.
Gastrointest Endosc
July 2017
Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega, Valladolid, Spain.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!