In 2007, many legislatures considered, and two enacted, bills mandating HPV vaccination for young girls as a condition of school attendance. Such mandates raise significant legal, ethical, and social concerns. This paper argues that mandating HPV vaccination for minor females is premature since long-term safety and effectiveness of the vaccine has not been established, HPV does not pose imminent and significant risk of harm to others, a sex specific mandate raises constitutional concerns, and a mandate will burden financially existing government health programs and private physicians. Absent careful consideration and public conversation, HPV mandates may undermine coverage rates for other vaccines.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-720X.2008.00282.x | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!