[Determining factors for deciding whether or not to treat refractive errors and cataract in people with a learning disability].

Objective: A study into the treatment of refractive errors and cataract in a selected population with learning disabilities. Design. Retrospective.

Method: In the years 1993-2003, 5205 people (mean age: 39 years) were referred to the visual advisory centre of Bartiméus (one of three institutes for the visually impaired in the Netherlands) by learning disability physicians and were assessed ophthalmologically. This assessment consisted of a measurement of visual acuity and refractive error, slitlamp examination and retinoscopy, and was performed at the client's accommodation. Advised treatment for spectacle prescriptions and referral for cataract surgery were registered.

Results: Refractive errors were found in 35% (1845/5205) of the patients with learning disabilities; 49% (905/1845) already wore spectacles; another 14% (265/1845) were prescribed spectacles for the first time. Of those with presbyopia, 12% (232/1865) had reading glasses and 10% (181/1865) were given a first prescription for spectacles. The most important determinant for not prescribing spectacles was: presence of severe learning disability (odds ratio (OR): 3.7). Cataract was present in 10% (497/5205) of the population; 399 patients were advised to be referred for surgery, 55% (219/399) were referred ofwhom 26% (57/219) had surgery. Moderately severe bilateral cataract was the only determinant of cataract surgery (OR: 7.8).

Conclusion: Refractive errors and cataract were not always treated in this group. One of the reasons for non-treatment of refractive errors was a severe learning disability. The reason for treatment or non-treatment in patients with cataract was less clear.