Objective: To assess the prevalence of "best practice" program components across a select sample of organizations, and to explore differences in engagement rates and health risk reduction between organizations using "best-practice" and "common-practice" health management approaches.

Methods: Using a retrospective approach, researchers assigned organizations to a "best practice" or "common-practice" group based on well-defined criteria. The study examined group differences in employee health assessment participation rates, health coaching program participation and completion rates, and organizational-level health risk reduction.

Results: Best-practice organizations achieved higher levels of engagement than common-practice organizations in both health assessment and health coaching programs. Population-level and intervention-level health risk reduction was 2.35 and 1.08 times higher, respectively, among best-practice organizations compared with common-practice organizations.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates the contribution of quality program components to superior program engagement rates and health outcomes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0b013e31817e7c1cDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

rates health
12
health risk
12
health
10
components superior
8
health management
8
"best practice"
8
program components
8
engagement rates
8
risk reduction
8
health assessment
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!