Frequency domain impedance measurements are still the common approach in assessing passive electrical properties of cells and tissues. However, due to the time requirements for sweeping over a frequency range for performing spectroscopy, they are not suited for recovering fast impedance changes of biological objects. The use of broad bandwidth excitation and monitoring the response as a function of time will greatly reduce the measurement time. The widespread usage of a square wave excitation is simple but not always the best choice. Here we consider different waveforms for excitation and discuss not only the advantages but also their limitations. Measurements in a miniaturized chamber where frequency and time domain measurements are compared show the suitability of different waveforms as excitation signals for the measurements of bio-impedance. The chirp excitation has been found to be most promising in terms of frequency range, signal-to-noise ratio and crest factor.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/29/6/S16DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

frequency range
8
waveforms excitation
8
excitation
5
broadband excitation
4
excitation short-time
4
short-time impedance
4
impedance spectroscopy
4
frequency
4
spectroscopy frequency
4
frequency domain
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!