A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

A magnetic resonance imaging-based articulatory and acoustic study of "retroflex" and "bunched" American English /r/. | LitMetric

A magnetic resonance imaging-based articulatory and acoustic study of "retroflex" and "bunched" American English /r/.

J Acoust Soc Am

Speech Communication Laboratory, Institute of Systems Research, and Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA.

Published: June 2008

AI Article Synopsis

  • Speakers of North American rhotic dialects exhibit various tongue configurations for the /r/ sound, yet these variations result in similar acoustic profiles for the first three formants.
  • The paper analyzes two subjects with distinct tongue shapes (retroflex and bunched) that produce similar F1-F3 patterns but differ in F4 and F5 spacing.
  • Findings indicate that the differences in F4/F5 patterns can be attributed to how the vocal tract's long cavity functions as a resonator, either as a half- or quarter-wavelength.

Article Abstract

Speakers of rhotic dialects of North American English show a range of different tongue configurations for /r/. These variants produce acoustic profiles that are indistinguishable for the first three formants [Delattre, P., and Freeman, D. C., (1968). "A dialect study of American English r's by x-ray motion picture," Linguistics 44, 28-69; Westbury, J. R. et al. (1998), "Differences among speakers in lingual articulation for American English /r/," Speech Commun. 26, 203-206]. It is puzzling why this should be so, given the very different vocal tract configurations involved. In this paper, two subjects whose productions of "retroflex" /r/ and "bunched" /r/ show similar patterns of F1-F3 but very different spacing between F4 and F5 are contrasted. Using finite element analysis and area functions based on magnetic resonance images of the vocal tract for sustained productions, the results of computer vocal tract models are compared to actual speech recordings. In particular, formant-cavity affiliations are explored using formant sensitivity functions and vocal tract simple-tube models. The difference in F4/F5 patterns between the subjects is confirmed for several additional subjects with retroflex and bunched vocal tract configurations. The results suggest that the F4/F5 differences between the variants can be largely explained by differences in whether the long cavity behind the palatal constriction acts as a half- or a quarter-wavelength resonator.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2680662PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.2902168DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

vocal tract
20
american english
16
magnetic resonance
8
tract configurations
8
vocal
5
tract
5
resonance imaging-based
4
imaging-based articulatory
4
articulatory acoustic
4
acoustic study
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!