Sink populations in carnivore management: cougar demography and immigration in a hunted population.

Ecol Appl

Large Carnivore Conservation Laboratory, Department of Natural Resource Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99164-6410, USA.

Published: June 2008

AI Article Synopsis

  • Carnivores are often hunted for sport and human population control, with the assumption that it helps manage populations while still ensuring some remain viable.
  • Hunting impacts vary based on factors like social structure and reproductive habits, with cougars showing resilience despite hunting efforts.
  • A study on cougars in a small area found that while hunting was expected to decrease populations, immigration from surrounding areas kept numbers stable, leading to shifts in age and gender ratios rather than a decline.

Article Abstract

Carnivores are widely hunted for both sport and population control, especially where they conflict with human interests. It is widely believed that sport hunting is effective in reducing carnivore populations and related human-carnivore conflicts, while maintaining viable populations. However, the way in which carnivore populations respond to harvest can vary greatly depending on their social structure, reproductive strategies, and dispersal patterns. For example, hunted cougar (Puma concolor) populations have shown a great degree of resiliency. Although hunting cougars on a broad geographic scale (> 2000 km2) has reduced densities, hunting of smaller areas (i.e., game management units, < 1000 km2), could conceivably fail because of increased immigration from adjacent source areas. We monitored a heavily hunted population from 2001 to 2006 to test for the effects of hunting at a small scale (< 1000 km2) and to gauge whether population control was achieved (lambda < or = 1.0) or if hunting losses were negated by increased immigration allowing the population to remain stable or increase (lambda > or = 1.0). The observed growth rate of 1.00 was significantly higher than our predicted survival/fecundity growth rates (using a Leslie matrix) of 0.89 (deterministic) and 0.84 (stochastic), with the difference representing an 11-16% annual immigration rate. We observed no decline in density of the total population or the adult population, but a significant decrease in the average age of independent males. We found that the male component of the population was increasing (observed male population growth rate, lambda(OM) = 1.09), masking a decrease in the female component (lambda(OF) = 0.91). Our data support the compensatory immigration sink hypothesis; cougar removal in small game management areas (< 1000 km2) increased immigration and recruitment of younger animals from adjacent areas, resulting in little or no reduction in local cougar densities and a shift in population structure toward younger animals. Hunting in high-quality habitats may create an attractive sink, leading to misinterpretation of population trends and masking population declines in the sink and surrounding source areas.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/07-0352.1DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

population
12
1000 km2
12
increased immigration
12
populations carnivore
8
hunted population
8
population control
8
carnivore populations
8
game management
8
source areas
8
growth rate
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!