Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: Coronary artery disease is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Multiple imaging modalities are used to screen for significant coronary artery disease. We report the concordance between coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) and stress cardiac positron emission tomography (CPET) to detect significant coronary artery disease, the feasibility of combining CTA and CPET in one diagnostic test, and the ability of CTA and CPET to detect significant coronary artery disease by comparison with cardiac catheterization.
Methods: Forty patients were prospectively enrolled and imaged with a hybrid PET/CT scanner. Eighteen patients had cardiac catheterization data for comparison. Concordance of findings between diagnostic tests was assessed by examining overall percentage in agreement, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values.
Results: The overall agreement between CTA and CPET for detecting significant coronary artery disease was 76.3% with a sensitivity and specificity of 91.7 and 69.2%, respectively. The overall agreement between CTA and cardiac catheterization for detecting significant coronary artery disease was 81.3% with a sensitivity and specificity of 81.8 and 80.0%, respectively. The overall agreement between CPET and cardiac catheterization for detecting significant coronary artery disease was 77.8% with a sensitivity and specificity of 76.9 and 80.0%, respectively.
Conclusion: CTA and CPET can be performed in a single diagnostic test interval to simultaneously assess the extent of coronary artery disease and its hemodynamic significance. The sensitivity and specificity of CTA and CPET are similar to existing noninvasive screening tests.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0b013e3282f8143b | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!