Rehabilitation of atrophic maxilla: a review of 101 zygomatic implants.

Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal

Prof. Cosme Gay Escoda, Centro Médico Teknon, C/ Vilana 12, 08022 - Barcelona (Spain), E-mail:

Published: June 2008

Introduction: Zygomatic implants are a good rehabilitation alternative for upper maxilla with severe bone reabsorption. These implants reduce the need for onlay-type bone grafting in the posterior sectors and for maxillary sinus lift procedures - limiting the use of bone grafts to the anterior zone of the upper jaw in those cases where grafting is considered necessary.

Objective: To evaluate the survival of 101 zygomatic implants placed in upper maxilla presenting important bone reabsorption, with a follow-up of 1-72 months.

Patients And Methods: A retrospective study was made of 101 Zygoma(R) implants (Nobel Biocare, Göteborg, Sweden) placed in 54 patients with totally edentulous and atrophic upper maxilla, in the period between 1998-2004. There were 35 women and 19 men, subjected to rehabilitation in the form of fixed prostheses and overdentures using 1-2 zygomatic implants and 2-7 implants in the anterior maxillary zone. The principal study variables were smoking, a history of sinusitis, the degree of bone reabsorption, and peri-implant bone loss, among others.

Results: The descriptive analysis of the 101 zygomatic implants placed in 54 patients with a mean age of 56 years (range 38-75) yielded a percentage survival of 96.04%, with four failed implants that were removed (two before and two after prosthetic loading). Nine patients were smokers, and none of the 54 subjects reported a history of sinus disorders.

Discussion And Conclusions: Zygomatic implants are designed for use in compromised upper maxilla. They allow the clinician to shorten the treatment time, affording an interesting alternative for fixed prosthetic rehabilitation. This study confirms that zygomatic bone offers predictable anchorage and acceptable support function for prostheses in atrophic jaws. However, these implants are not without complications. Longer-term evaluations are needed of zygomatic implant survival in order to establish a correct clinical prognosis.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

zygomatic implants
24
upper maxilla
16
101 zygomatic
12
bone reabsorption
12
implants
11
zygomatic
8
bone
7
maxilla
5
upper
5
rehabilitation
4

Similar Publications

Background: Zygomatic implants are becoming an ideal treatment approach for implant-supported prosthesis treatment developed for the atrophic maxilla. This study aims to evaluate the amount and distribution of stress in implants and peri-implant bone using different implant-supported prosthesis configurations in Aramany Class I maxillary defects through 3-dimensional finite element analysis.

Methods: A 3-dimensional finite element model of the Aramany class I defect was created.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: The study aimed to compare the short-term outcomes (3.7±0.4yrs) of full-arch immediately loaded fixed maxillary prostheses supported by conventional and unilateral single zygomatic implants versus those supported by conventional and bilateral single zygomatic implants.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Static Zygomatic Guides: Digital ZAGA Concept.

Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am

January 2025

Desert Ridge Oral Surgery Institute, 20950 N Tatum Boulevard #200, Phoenix, AZ 85050, USA; Private Practice of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Phoenix, AZ, USA; Banner University Medical Center, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA.

Guided zygomatic implant placement surgery has emerged as a promising solution for patients with severe maxillary bone loss, offering precise implant placement and predictable outcomes. This article provides a comprehensive review of the current state-of-the-art techniques, advantages, challenges, and future directions in guided zygomatic implant surgery.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Feasibility, trueness and precision of intraoral scanners in digitizing maxillectomy defects with exposed zygomatic implants in situ: An in vitro 3D comparative study.

J Dent

February 2025

Department of Reconstructive Dentistry and Gerodontology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Department of Conservative Dentistry and Orofacial Prosthodontics, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Complutense University of Madrid, Ramon y Cajal Research Institute (IRYCIS). Madrid, Spain. Electronic address:

Objectives: To in-vitro evaluate the feasibility and accuracy (trueness and precision) of various intraoral scanners (IOS) to digitize maxillectomy defect models with exposed zygomatic implants in situ.

Material And Methods: Six partially edentulous and edentulous maxillectomy defect models with 2 zygomatic implants each were obtained. References scans were obatined by using a laboratory scanner (inEos X5; Dentsply Sirona).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Prosthetic rehabilitation of a hemimaxillectomy patient using a zygomatic - Corticobasal® implant- supported reconstructive prosthesis: A case report.

Int J Surg Case Rep

January 2025

Department of Prosthodontics, RAK College of Dental Sciences, RAK Medical and Health Sciences University, Ras Al Khaimah, United Arab Emirates. Electronic address:

Introduction: Rehabilitation of patients with hemimaxillectomy presents a challenge. This case report describes the successful use of zygomatic Corticobasal® implant- supported reconstructed prosthesis.

Clinical Case Presentation: A 20-year-old female patient presented to the clinic following hemimaxillectomy with soft tissue approximation one year ago.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!