Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: MUC-1 is synthesized as a single polypeptide that then undergoes proteolytic cleavage, and is associated with the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinases. In malignancies, MUC-1 may function as an anti-adhesion molecule, but can also promote adhesion and presumably metastasis.
Materials And Methods: Expression of MUC-1, -2, -4 and -5AC was evaluated on tissue microarrays of gastric carcinomas (n = 237) and adjacent non-cancerous mucosa specimens (n = 89) by immunohistochemistry and compared with clinicopathological parameters and survival time of the patients.
Results: MUC-1 was found to be highly expressed in gastric carcinomas in comparison with noncancerous mucosa (p < 0.05) and positively correlated with depth of invasion, lymphatic and venous invasion, lymph node metastasis, UICC staging and MUC-4 expression (p < 0.05), but not with age, tumor size, MUC-2 or MUC-5AC expression (p > 0.05). Intestinal-type carcinomas showed more MUC-1 expression than their diffuse-type counterparts (p < 0.05). Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that the cumulative survival rate of patients with no MUC-1 expression was significantly higher than those with weak, moderate or strong expression in gastric carcinomas (p < 0.05), but no difference was observed when tumors were stratified according to the depth of invasion (p > 0.05). Cox's analysis showed three independent prognostic factors, depth of invasion, lymphatic invasion and venous invasion, to affect the relationship between MUC-1 expression and prognosis.
Conclusion: Up-regulation of MUC-1 expression may be involved in pathogenesis, invasion, metastasis and differentiation of gastric carcinoma. Altered expression might therefore be employed as an indicator of pathobiological behavior of gastric carcinoma. MUC-1 expression was found to be a prognostic factor for gastric carcinoma patients, albeit not independent of parameters of invasion.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!