Purpose: Ureteral stents are commonly inserted under fluoroscopic guidance. Our objective was to determine the intravesical landmarks for stent insertion by mapping the fluoroscopic location of the ureteral orifices (UOs) and bladder neck (BN) in relation to the pubic symphysis (PS).

Methods: In patients undergoing ureteroscopy, the UO to BN distance was measured during cystoscopy with a 5F ureteral catheter. Radiographic distance between the UO, BN, and superior border of the PS was determined by mapping their locations on digital fluoroscopic images. Measurements were performed with a full (to 50 cm H2O) and empty bladder.

Results: With an empty bladder, the mean cystoscopic BN to UO distance was 1.8 cm (+/- 0.4) for men (n = 10) and 2.0 cm (+/- 0.4) for women (n = 11). With a full bladder, it was 2.8 cm (+/- 0.5) for men and 2.9 cm (+/- 0.6) for women. Although the intravesical distance lengthened during cystoscopy (by 50%), there was no difference when viewed fluoroscopically; the BN to UO distance lengthened by only 15%. In men, the UOs were located superior to PS in the majority (83% and 95%, empty and full bladder, respectively). In women, however, the UOs resided behind the PS (73% and 50%, empty and full bladder, respectively). The BN in men was also cephalad to that in women (P = 0.01); superior to the PS in 50%; and behind the upper two thirds of the PS in 50%. In women, the BN was behind the lower two thirds of the PS in the majority (81%).

Conclusions: During fluoroscopic ureteral stent insertion, the radiopaque marker of the stent positioner is situated at the superior border of the PS in men and behind the lower one third of the PS in women, permitting formation of an intravesical distal coil. One way to remember this is that men are on top and women are on the bottom of the PS.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/end.2008.0048DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

stent insertion
12
full bladder
12
fluoroscopic ureteral
8
ureteral stent
8
superior border
8
+/- men
8
men +/-
8
+/- women
8
distance lengthened
8
empty full
8

Similar Publications

Introduction: Bowel perforation due to migrated biliary stent is a rare complication. Here, we report a case of duodenal and ascending colonal perforation due to biliary stent migration.

Case Presentation: A 35-year-old man is complaining of right upper abdominal pain presented to the gastroenterology department.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Pancreatic trauma is a rare type of abdominal injury, representing only 0.3 % of pediatric trauma cases. This condition may progress to chronic pancreatitis and result in multiple complications following damage to the pancreatic duct.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Stent-induced ductal change is a complication of endoscopic treatment of the main pancreatic duct in chronic pancreatitis. Most previous reports have been based on morphological duct changes observed via pancreatography. Here, we describe a case of stent-induced ductal change in which the course of the mucosal changes was observed through peroral pancreatoscopy with a videoscopy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: In an effort to treat patients with malignant hilar obstruction (MHO), both percutaneous trans-hepatic biliary stenting (PTBS) and endoscopic biliary stenting (EBS) strategies have been implemented in the clinic, but the relative advantages of these techniques remain to be clarified.

Aim: This meta-analysis was designed to compare the relative clinical efficacy of PTBS and EBS in MHO patients.Material and methods: Relevant studies were identified through searches of the PubMed, Web of science, and Wanfang databases, and pooled analyses of these studies were then performed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Suspicion of vascular injury during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) should be raised in the event of intraprocedural bleeding, persistent hyperbilirubinemia, and sepsis despite biliary stenting. Most inadvertent portal vein (PV) cannulations during ERCP are innocuous, and mere withdrawal of guidewire and catheter suffices. However, unintentional PV stenting, particularly with larger metallic stents, increases the likelihood of significant bleeding.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!