A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Monte Carlo simulation of backscatter from lead for clinical electron beams using EGSnrc. | LitMetric

Monte Carlo simulation of backscatter from lead for clinical electron beams using EGSnrc.

Med Phys

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Published: April 2008

In electron radiotherapy of superficial lesions in the eyelid, lip, buccal mucosa, ear, and nose, backscattered electrons are produced from the lead shield used to protect the critical tissue underneath the tumor. In this study, the backscattered electrons, produced by clinical electron beams using a Varian 21 EX linear accelerator, were studied using Monte Carlo simulations. The electron backscatter factor (EBF), defined as the ratio of dose at the tissue-lead interface to the dose at the same point without the presence of backscatter, was calculated using the Monte Carlo EGSnrc-based code. The calculated EBFs were verified with measurements using metal-oxide-semiconductor field effect transistor detectors. The effect of the (1) initial electron beam energy, (2) thickness of bolus over the lead shield, (3) beam's angle of incidence, and (4) presence of an aluminum sheet used to absorb backscattered electrons, on the EBF, were studied. It is found that for lead shielding positioned at any fixed depth, the EBF decreases with an increase in initial electron beam energy (4-16 MeV). In addition, for depths within the electron practical range, Rp, and at a particular beam energy, the EBF increases with depth (or thickness of the treatment volume). When the electron beam angle increases from 0 degrees to 5 degrees, the EBF only decreases slightly (<4%) for all energies. The influence of the beam obliquity on the EBF is important when the treatment surface is not flat and perpendicular to the central beam axis. The use of an aluminum sheet to reduce backscattered electrons was also investigated. For a relatively low electron beam energy (4 MeV), a 2 mm aluminum sheet can reduce backscattering by 31%. While the electron beam energy increased, less backscattered electrons were produced and therefore removed by the same thickness of aluminum (only about 6% for 16 MeV). The Monte Carlo calculated EBFs from this study, characterized by the electron beam energy, depth of bolus above the lead shield, beam obliquity, and presence of an aluminum sheet, may provide important clinical information for radiation oncology staff when considering the effect of electron backscatter on radiotherapy using internal shielding.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.2874552DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

monte carlo
12
backscattered electrons
12
electron beam
12
beam energy
12
electron
8
clinical electron
8
electron beams
8
electrons produced
8
lead shield
8
initial electron
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!