Introduction: The Preoperative Chemotherapy in Primary Operable Breast Cancer (POCOB) study was designed to compare preoperative with postoperative chemotherapy in patients with early breast cancer concerning breast conserving therapy (BCT) procedures, disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).

Methods: Patients (n = 698) with early breast cancer were enrolled between 1991 and 1999 and randomized between preoperative versus postoperative chemotherapy (four cycles of fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide). Endpoints were BCT procedures, DFS, OS, and tumor response to preoperative chemotherapy. In addition, tumor tissue was collected for translational research and the following markers were examined: ER, PgR, HER2, p21, p53, and bcl-2 expression.

Results: With a median follow-up of 10 years, there was no statistically significant difference between the two treatment arms for OS (HR = 1.09; 95%CI 0.83-1.42; P = 0.54), DFS (HR = 1.12; 95%CI 0.90-1.39; P = 0.30), or locoregional recurrences (LRR, HR = 1.16; 95%CI 0.77-1.74). Preoperative chemotherapy was associated with an increase in BCT rates. BCT in part feasible due to tumor downsizing after preoperative chemotherapy was not correlated with higher LRR or worse OS compared to BCT which was feasible without downsizing of the tumor. Using available tumor material, only tumor stage, nodal stage, and grade were independent prognostic factors for overall survival.

Conclusions: Preoperative chemotherapy does not result in a difference in OS or DFS compared to postoperative chemotherapy in patients with early breast cancer. Moreover, it increases BCT rates with no significant increase of LRR. This implies that preoperative chemotherapy is a safe procedure for patients with early breast cancer, even after a follow-up period of 10 years.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-008-0050-1DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

preoperative chemotherapy
28
breast cancer
24
early breast
20
postoperative chemotherapy
12
patients early
12
preoperative
9
chemotherapy
9
chemotherapy safe
8
chemotherapy patients
8
bct procedures
8

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • The study investigates how changes in the Ki67 biomarker before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) affect survival in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).
  • Among 1,777 TNBC patients analyzed, most showed a decrease in tumor size and Ki67 levels after NACT, though many had no change or experienced treatment discontinuation.
  • Patients with unchanged Ki67 had significantly worse overall and disease-specific survival compared to those with decreased Ki67, emphasizing the need for personalized treatment strategies based on ongoing monitoring of this biomarker.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) is a widely used scale to assess performance status. KPS ≥ 50% implies that patients can live at home. Therefore, maintaining KPS ≥ 50% is important to improve the quality of life of patients with glioblastoma, whose median survival is less than 2 years.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Empirical antibiotic therapy is often initiated during the hospital stay while awaiting laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This approach is generally justified in patients with moderate (Tokyo II) and severe (Tokyo III) acute cholecystitis, where organ dysfunction occurs as a result of the inflammatory or infectious process. However, there is no clear consensus regarding the use of antibiotics in patients with mild (Tokyo I) cholecystitis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Liver transplantation is an important treatment option for liver cirrhosis in patients with HIV/HCV coinfection. In Japan, the limited number of deceased donors may force the selection of living donor liver transplantation. Appropriate graft selection is the key to success.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Although neoadjuvant systemic treatment for non-metastatic breast cancer has gained ground during the past decade, there is no compelling evidence that it improves overall survival compared to primary tumor resection and adjuvant treatment. At the same time, the approach to responders to neoadjuvant treatment in the axilla is evolving.

Materials And Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected population-based registry.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!