Objective: To investigate foam generation during brushing, and the oral debris and bacteria removal efficacy of an experimental gel-to-foam dentifrice compared to a commercially-available dentifrice after brushing.
Methods: Thirty-four subjects participated in this blinded, crossover study. After a wash-out period prior to each session of product use, subjects reported to the site having abstained from oral hygiene, eating and drinking from 22:00 h on the evening prior to treatment visits. The subjects brushed with a weighed dose of assigned paste and were asked to expectorate their toothpaste slurry into a collection vessel at 30 and 60 seconds during supervised brushing. The expectorated foam was measured immediately, after which subjects rinsed with 10 ml of sterile water and expectorated into the same vessel. Samples were placed on ice and immediately transported to the laboratory for analysis. Bacteria (total anaerobes and VSC-producing bacteria) were enumerated using appropriate selective media. To calculate the amount of debris, a measured portion of the sample was deposited onto a pre-weighed dish and weighed. Dishes were dried thoroughly and weighed again after cooling.
Results: Use of the gel-to-foam dentifrice resulted in 105% greater foam volume compared with use of the control dentifrice (p < 0.0001). Further, the gel-to-foam dentifrice removed 15.77% more debris than the control dentifrice (p-value = 0.0342). There was greater removal of total anaerobes and VSC-producing bacteria by the gel-to-foam dentifrice versus the control dentifrice (p-value < 0.0001).
Conclusion: Single use of a gel-to-foam dentifrice generated a greater volume of foam and removed a greater amount of oral debris and bacteria during brushing than a standard dentifrice.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9969(08)70006-2 | DOI Listing |
Caries Res
September 2017
GSK Consumer Healthcare R&D, Weybridge, UK.
This single-center, randomized, placebo-controlled, four-treatment, four-period crossover study compared the enamel remineralization effects of low- and medium-abrasivity gel-to-foam toothpastes and a reference toothpaste (all 1,450 ppm fluoride as NaF) versus placebo toothpaste (0 ppm fluoride) using a short-term in situ erosion model. Subjects (n = 56) wearing a palatal appliance holding acid-softened bovine enamel specimens brushed their teeth with the test toothpastes. Thereafter, the specimens were removed for analysis of percent surface microhardness recovery (%SMHR) and percent relative erosion resistance (%RER) at 2, 4, and 8 h.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObjective: To evaluate the in situ caries performance and safety of two experimental fluoride dentifrice formulations (1450 ppm fluoride) with and without 2% isopentane as an excipient, in comparison to a positive control, currently marketed dentifrice (1450 ppm fluoride) and a negative control dentifrice (0 ppm fluoride).
Methods: This was a single-center, examiner-blind, randomized, controlled, four-treatment cross-over study. During each treatment period, the subject wore a modified mandibular partial denture fitted with two gauze-covered, partially demineralized human enamel specimens, and brushed at home for one timed minute, twice daily, for two weeks.
Int Dent J
August 2011
Global Health Research Group, New Delhi, India.
Objectives: To assess the ability of 0.1%w/w o-cymen-5-ol/ 0.6%w/w zinc chloride gel to foam dentifrice to maintain gingival health compared to a sodium fluoride control dentifrice.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAm J Dent
October 2009
Colgate-Palmolive Technology Center, 909 River Road, PO Box 1343, Piscataway, NJ 08855-1343, USA.
Purpose: To compare the effects of a new gel-to-foam dentifrice to two standard fluoride control dentifrices on foam generation, levels of total viable anaerobes and total viable volatile sulfur compound (VSC)-producing bacteria in expectorate after brushing.
Methods: 36 subjects participated in this investigator-blind, randomized, crossover study. After a 1-week wash-out period prior to each product use, participants reported to the test site having refrained from oral hygiene, eating and drinking on the morning prior to the visit.
Arch Oral Biol
April 2008
GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare, Weybridge, UK.
Objective: To investigate foam generation during brushing, and the oral debris and bacteria removal efficacy of an experimental gel-to-foam dentifrice compared to a commercially-available dentifrice after brushing.
Methods: Thirty-four subjects participated in this blinded, crossover study. After a wash-out period prior to each session of product use, subjects reported to the site having abstained from oral hygiene, eating and drinking from 22:00 h on the evening prior to treatment visits.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!