Many pretreatment modalities used prior to ovulation induction have been proposed to increase the success rate in women undergoing assisted reproductive technologies. However, no clear evidence from well-designed clinical trials has shown a benefit of these treatments. We conducted a systematic review to explore the effect of different pretreatment therapies on outcomes of in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles. Studies were limited to women treated prior to undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in IVF cycles with low-dose aspirin, metformin, growth hormone, oral contraceptives, or corticosteroid supplementation versus placebo or no supplementation. Searches were conducted in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and ISI Proceedings, and all randomized controlled trials that evaluated the effectiveness of those therapies compared with placebo or no treatment in women before IVF were included. The main outcome measures considered were clinical pregnancy and live birth rates, miscarriage rate, number of oocytes retrieved, cycle cancellations, and the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. We conclude that, currently, no clear evidence indicates that using any of these pretreatment modalities is superior to no treatment in IVF cycles. Even when the studies are pooled, small sample size and low power preclude a complete assessment of adjuvant treatment modalities before ovulation stimulation in IVF cycles.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1196/annals.1434.004 | DOI Listing |
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
January 2025
Reproductive Obstetrics and Gynecology Center of the Second Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, 210028, Nanjing, China.
Background: The safety and effectiveness of short-term insemination remain a subject of controversy. This study aims to investigate the impact of short-term insemination on both embryo quality and pregnancy outcomes and whether it is necessary to apply short-term insemination to all patients underwent in vitro fertilization (IVF).
Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 3,496 patients from two centers over the period January 2016 to December 2022.
J Assist Reprod Genet
January 2025
Department of Assisted Reproductive Medicine, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, 2699nd West Gao Ke Road, Shanghai, 201204, China.
Purpose: Women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) show greater heterogeneity in ovarian responses during ovarian stimulation. We aimed to investigate the potential predicting factors among individualized basic parameters that affect poor or hyper ovarian responses in PCOS patients.
Methods: We retrospectively screened 2058 women with PCOS who underwent their first cycle of in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
Objective: We aimed to compare highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin (hp-hMG) and recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH) in short antagonist in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles of patients with poor ovarian reserve (POR). Limited research exists on this comparison in short antagonist cycles for this patient group.
Materials And Methods: This retrospective cohort study involved 165 POR patients aged 18-45 years who underwent IVF between 2018 and 2022.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
January 2025
Reproductive Medicine Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, 325000, China.
Background: Insulin resistance (IR) is a common pathophysiologic feature in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). However, there have been no studies investigating the association of IR surrogates with pregnancy outcomes in women with PCOS undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF). Therefore, we explored the association between these factors among PCOS patients.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFReprod Biomed Online
March 2024
Boston IVF - The Eugin Group, Waltham, MA, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Research Question: Among women who considered planned oocyte cryopreservation, does decision regret differ between those who pursued planned oocyte cryopreservation and those who did not?
Design: A survey was e-mailed to all women who presented for an initial consultation for planned oocyte cryopreservation between January 2016 and December 2021 using a secure REDCap platform. The survey comprised questions on demographics, reproductive planning and the validated Decision Regret Scale (DRS). Univariable and multivariable models were fitted to compare decision regret in the group who had proceeded with planned oocyte cryopreservation with the group who had not.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!