Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the treatment-specific outcome of surgical therapy of chondromatosis of the elbow with special attention on the complication and recurrence rate as well as induction of secondary osteoarthritis.
Methods: A consecutive patient group from 1989 to 2003 was evaluated retrospectively and followed up clinically and radiologically. Special attention was paid to locking and catching, swelling, pain, loose bodies, and signs of osteoarthritis. In the case of a causal pathology, mostly osteoarthritis, the condition was classified as secondary; otherwise, it was classified as primary. The following scores were calculated: modified American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons questionnaire for elbows; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire; and Short Form 36.
Results: Of 24 patients operated on, 19 (79%) were followed up after 56 months (range, 11 to 177 months). Of these, 10 were primary types and 9 secondary types. The extension deficit of 12 degrees preoperatively decreased to -9 degrees , and pain was significantly (P = .001) reduced. Postoperatively, 1 patient still reported occasional locking and 1 patient had swelling. In both patients no loose bodies could be identified by radiography. Comparison of the arthroscopic and open techniques showed a trend toward a shorter rehabilitation time of 2.4 months after arthroscopic intervention, in contrast to 4.6 months for an open procedure, and a trend toward higher patient satisfaction after arthroscopy. Comparison of the primary and secondary forms showed significantly (P = .042) better pain reduction for primary chondromatosis. Of the patients with distinct preoperative osteoarthritis, 44% showed ongoing osteophytic growth; there were no cases of new osteoarthritis.
Conclusions: Both open and arthroscopic approaches give satisfactory results with a trend toward shorter rehabilitation and higher patient satisfaction for the arthroscopic approach. Osteoarthritis is not induced and there is no danger of recurrence in the medium term.
Level Of Evidence: Level III, therapeutic, retrospective comparative study.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2007.12.002 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
No Difference in External Rotation Loss After Isolated Bankart Repair, Remplissage, or Latarjet: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Am J Sports Med
January 2025
Oregon Shoulder Institute, Medford, Oregon, USA.
Background: Despite the effectiveness of remplissage in reducing instability recurrence, debate remains about the loss of external rotation (ER) after this procedure.
Purpose: To compare the loss of ER after primary isolated arthroscopic Bankart repair alone (BR), Bankart with remplissage (REMP), and Latarjet (LAT) procedures.
Study Design: Meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 3.
Knotless Versus Knotted Suture Anchors for Labral Repair of the Hip: A Systematic Review of Clinical and Biomechanical Outcomes.
Am J Sports Med
January 2025
Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Background: Arthroscopic labral repair of the hip is successfully performed with increasing frequency using either knotless or knotted suture anchors, each with its own risks and benefits.
Purpose: To examine biomechanical and clinical outcomes for labral repair of the hip based on the use of knotted or knotless suture anchors.
Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.
Arthroscopy Is at Least as Effective as Arthrotomy for Treatment of Septic Arthritis in Adults: A Systematic Review of Large and Intermediate Joints.
Am J Sports Med
January 2025
Southern California Orthopedic Institute, Van Nuys, California, USA.
Background: Surgical options for septic arthritis include open arthrotomy or an arthroscopic procedure. The optimal surgical technique remains a matter of debate as acceptable results have been reported for both.
Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of arthroscopy versus arthrotomy for the treatment of septic arthritis in large and intermediate-sized joints.
Arthroscopic Repair of Bursal-Sided Partial-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears: Literature Review and Meta-analysis.
Am J Sports Med
January 2025
Service de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique, CHU de Toulouse, France.
Background: The surgical management of bursal-sided partial-thickness rotator cuff tendon tears is controversial. The 2 methods used are in situ repair (ISR), preserving the contingent of intact articular tendon fiber, or tear completion before repair (TCBR) according to the operating surgeon's usual technique. No study with sufficient power has demonstrated a superior technique.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFOpen Latarjet Results in Lower Recurrent Instability and Revision Rates Than Arthroscopic Bankart Repair at 10-Year Follow-up: A Systematic Review.
Arthroscopy
January 2025
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA. Electronic address:
Purpose: To compare arthroscopic Bankart repair versus the open Latarjet procedure at a minimum of 10-year follow-up evaluating recurrence and arthropathy development rates.
Methods: A systematic review was performed in concordance with PRISMA guidelines. Studies were included if they reported on the arthroscopic Bankart repair or open Latarjet procedure with a minimum of 10-year follow-up.
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!